Is Pro Wrestling Really Cyclical?
Written by Jade on October 15th, 2007 in Uncategorized.
The following was not written by me. It was written by Cody Deaner, an indie wrestler based out of Alabama. It is reposted here with his permission.
The following blog was written for http://www.thaoshow.com:
Is Pro Wrestling Really Cyclical?
About a month ago at a GCW show I asked Donnie and Dan-e-o, “When the hell am I going to get an O Show t-shirt? Jeez … I’m on the friggin’ writing staff!” And Dan-e-o replied, “When you write another column you lazy prick!”
Well Dan-e-o (you 4-foot Pizza Pop poppin’ freestylin’ midget), here’s your column. And I expect my t-shirt at the next wrestling show I see you at.
In this column, I want to write about a question that I have been asking myself lately: “Is Pro Wrestling Really Cyclical?” …
The quick answer that most workers, fans, and office personnel give is an easy one: “Yes.” Historically, you hear almost every great worker from Flair to Hogan, to Austin, to Michaels say the same thing (especially when business is going bad): “Wrestling is just going through a down time right now. Things will pick up. They always do. Don’t worry … this business is cyclical.” What these guys mean when they say this is that wrestling has its ups and downs. Sometimes the highs are really high - like the Hogan Era, or the Stone Cold Era. And sometimes, the lows are really low - like the Isaac Yankem era, or the “Viagra on a Pole Match” era. But either way, people always believe that the business will come full circle. If business is good, the good times won’t last forever. Or if business is bad, eventually things will pick up. People are saying that very thing about the wrestling business right now.
I would consider the wrestling business to be in a “down time” right now. Ratings aren’t good. The TV product isn’t good. And in general, pro wrestling is considered a dirty word whenever it is spoken of by the mainstream media. So, I ask myself, will things pick up? Will wrestling ever be good again? Will pro wrestling ever be what I remember it being when I was a young 6 year old? My friends in the business keep telling me “Yes.” But, day after day, the more I think about it, I can’t help but think the correct answer is actually “No.”
And I’ll tell you why …
The business is simply not what it used to be. Plain and simple.
Pro wrestling is no longer about the “artform.” It’s not about putting on a dramatic match. It’s about putting together a formulaic spot-fest that fits within the confides of a 6 minute TV timeslot. It’s not about developing a character and allowing guys to build that character through dramatic, meaningful, and fun promos. It’s about giving guys a script for their part on the TV show. It’s not about building young talent who genuinely love the business and want to see it succeed. It’s about creating robots who will make you a quick buck who could care less about the history of pro wrestling or what a privilege it is to be part of such a special fraternity.
I think most people think that, like in the past, all the crappy writers, and all the crappy wrestlers will eventually be weeded out and we’ll be left with some good wrestling again. Folks … I’m sorry to say that’s just not happening. The modern pro wrestling system will not allow this to happen. Let me explain this “system” to you.
Where does the WWE go to get new talent? Their developmental system. What’s being developed in their “developmental” system? Robots. You either have guys that have no business being in the sport (i.e. body-builders, self-marks, jabronies) being taught how to put together the formula of wrestling match; or, you have guys who are genuinely passionate about wrestling trying to make a name for themselves, but are politically held back or punished for straying from the formula. I’m not going to go into depth about what I mean by “formula” because that would require going in depth about ring psychology, which I simply refuse to do in a public forum. But, I will say, you simply can’t teach someone to have “it.” You can’t teach someone how to draw people into their match. There is no “formula” on how to do this. Some guys naturally have this ability. But, unfortunately, most guys don’t. I have seen maybe 5-7 pre-35 year old workers on TV in the last 5 years that actually keep my attention. And that’s bad. Because I love wrestling. I can’t help but think there just HAS to be something wrong when I can’t watch wrestling … because it’s my passion.
So … why has this “system” developed? Why isn’t the WWE scouting indy talent and bringing in guys that genuinely LOVE wrestling and have that “it” factor? Because they don’t have to. They are making money without doing that. It sucks, but it’s true. The WWE is make money. Ya, I consider the business to be in a “down time,” but that’s not to say that the WWE is losing money. They make tonnes of money overseas. They are now a public company. So they have investors giving them money. Also, the WWE is no longer strictly a “wrestling” product. No, it’s a clothing apparel product, a movie making product, a music industry product, etc. Vince has expanded the brand of WWE so much that the focus is no longer what is happening in the ring. I recently heard Harley Race say that nowadays what happens before and after the match is more important than what happens during the match. This is sad but true.
Here’s the bottom line that I have come to: Money-wise, wrestling will always be cyclical. BUT, in-ring quality wise … I don’t think this is true anymore. There will always be pro wrestling on TV. But, there will not always be good pro wrestling on TV. Eventually, good wrestling will die. The artform will be totally annihilated. It’s well on it’s way.
Is there any hope?
I recently read Terry Funk’s biography. He argues that wrestling is cyclical, and he gives a very interesting take on where the business is headed. I think his hypothesis might just give us some hope.
Here’s a paraphrased version of Terry Funk’s argument:
The art of pro wrestling is pretty much dead. Since Vince McMahon exposed wrestling as a “work,” the artform has slowly gone downhill. The new pro wrestling is MMA. MMA is now realizing that worked-shoots draw much more money. UFC does a fantastic job of building talent and promoting PPV’s. Eventually though, MMA will be exposed for what it is - a “work.” And eventually MMA will evolve and start to add more drama to the package. And what we’ll be left with is what we used to have in the 50’s, 60’s, and 70’s - realistic pro wrestling. And eventually, it will continue to evolve, get more exposed and we’ll again have what we have today in the pro wrestling world. Eventually, the whole cycle will start over again.
When I first heard this argument, it really made me think. I’ve been calling UFC and MMA a work for years. Apparently Terry Funk agrees with me.
UFC is the new pro wrestling. People cram arenas and buy up PPV’s to see someone get beat up. Sound familiar? Ya … pro wrestling when it was good. UFC builds there talent on their weekly TV shows better than pro wrestling companies. They build legit, easy to understand feuds better than pro wrestling companies. And they build their workers and feuds around one simple thing - competition. That’s the issue. Who’s better? Who’s the better man? Who is tougher than who? Who can knock the other guy out? Who can tap the other guy out? Who can carry the gold? Sound familiar? Ya … pro wrestling when it was good.
I know a lot of you O-sters are going to disagree with this theory and defend MMA as legit. That’s fine. That just means that the UFC/MMA is doing its job. It’s working you. Which is awesome. Cherish that. You get to be a true mark and enjoy the product like you are supposed to. Instead of watching a match
and “critiquing” the “ring psychology” of it all. You just get to sit back and go along for the dramatic ride.
Here’s the only problem I have with this theory. I don’t like MMA.
I love pro wrestling. I want to see pro wrestling be admired, respected, and enjoyed again. But, with the current “system” that is in place, with the current talent, and the current mindset of the North American promoter, I just don’t think I’m going to see an awesome product again.
I hope I’m wrong. But, I don’t think I am.
Let me know what you think.
As always, keep givin’er,
Cody Deaner


October 15th, 2007 at 6:35 pm
Am I crazy or is this to focused on the WWE? I understand that the E is the major force in sports entertainment but this isn’t the 80s where we only have access to what is on TV.
I mean in the 90s ECW made a name on house shows and tape traders. They changed the face of pro wrestling because people consumed their product.
ROH is building up that same type of following through the internet and DVD sales. Hell TNA got themselves on TV/PPV through the same process - the internet has opened up avenues to consumers that weren’t always there.
I agree that the formula and the WWE style of match probably won’t change but that doesn’t mean that the WWE is the end all/be all of professional wrestling.
If you love wrestling you can find quality out there. There are a lot of indepedent promotions that in my mind put on great shows that can be found online or through DVDs. There are international promotions that do great business and those are online and on DVD.
I think the face of professional wrestling will change from the “what is on TV is what controls” to fans finding what they like and making that the standard. I think it’s much easier for consumers to find better pro wrestling without going to MMA simply because MMA is on tv.
I do like this piece though I just think it’s a bit limited in scope.
October 15th, 2007 at 7:53 pm
bring back “wrestling” is all i have to say
October 16th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
i agree with him completely,he’s spoken like a really disappointed wrestling fan.
October 16th, 2007 at 3:18 pm
The thing is is that he is a worker and as someone involved in the business I tend to agree with him. I’ve been to indy shows where all they do is make their card look like E because that is what the folks expect. Sadly there is few like place I work (www.ewamaryland.com) where we like having the more traditional style of show. Where it isn’t all about high spots, or talking (even if our owner does talk…a lot) and are incorporating that MMA feel to it.
TNA is guilty of trying too much to be the E. Back in the day there were matches, not 2 minute ones either, and there wasn’t as much mic time. Now the quality has gone down cause they’re trying to be the E. They need to get back to have solid matches that take longer then a shot of whiskey to sit through.
I will disagree with the notion that some workers under 35 don’t know how to work anymore. Perhaps in the area he works this may be true, but other places kids are being taught correctly and know how to put on a show, they are being taught the “artform”.